A large corporation hired an independent marketing firm to manage its email advertising campaign. Subsequently, it was found that the firm was sending commercial emails without including necessary information about how to stop receiving emails in the future. In addition, they failed to honor the opt-out requests of the recipients within 10 business days. Under the CAN-SPAM Act, which of the following is true?

A. Both the corporation and the marketing firm could be held legally responsible for the violation

B. Only the corporation would be held legally responsible for the violation

C. The marketing firm alone would be held legally responsible for the violation

D. Neither the corporation nor the marketing firm would be held legally responsible for the violation








 

Suggested Answer: A

Community Answer: A



This question is in 312-49V10 EC-Council Computer Hacking Forensic Investigator (CHFI) v10 Exam
For getting EC-Council Computer Hacking Forensic Investigator (CHFI) Certificate







Disclaimers:
The website is not related to, affiliated with, endorsed or authorized by EC-Council. 
Trademarks, certification & product names are used for reference only and belong to EC-Council.
The website does not contain actual questions and answers from EC-Council's Certification Exams.