A network administrator recently redistributed RIP routes into an OSPF domain. However, the administrator wants to configure the network so that instead of 32 external type-5 LSAs flooding into the OSPF network, there is only one. What must the administrator do to accomplish this?

QuestionsCategory: 300-101A network administrator recently redistributed RIP routes into an OSPF domain. However, the administrator wants to configure the network so that instead of 32 external type-5 LSAs flooding into the OSPF network, there is only one. What must the administrator do to accomplish this?
Admin Staff asked 3 months ago
A network administrator recently redistributed RIP routes into an OSPF domain.
However, the administrator wants to configure the network so that instead of 32 external type-5 LSAs flooding into the OSPF network, there is only one.
 Image
What must the administrator do to accomplish this?

A. Configure summarization on R1 with area 1 range 172.16.32.0 255.255.224.0

B. Configure summarization on R1 with summary-address 172.16.32.0 255.255.224.0

C. Configure area 1 as a stub area with area 1 stub

D. Configure area 1 as a NSSA area with area 1 stub nssa








 

Suggested Answer: B

In many cases, the router doesn't even need specific routes to each and every subnet (for example, 172.16.1.0/24).
It would be just as happy if it knew how to get to the major network (for example, 172.16.0.0/16) and let another router take it from there.
In our telephone network example, the local telephone switch should only need to know to route a phone call to the switch for the called area code.
Similarly, a router's ability to take a group of subnetworks and summarize them as one network (in other words, one advertisement) is called route summarization.
Besides reducing the number of routing entries that a router must keep track of, route summarization can also help protect an external router from making multiple changes to its routing table due to instability within a particular subnet.
For example, let's say that we were working on a router that connected to 172.16.2.0/24. As we were working on the router, we rebooted it several times. If we were not summarizing our routes, an external router would see each time 172.16.2.0/24 went away and came back. Each time, it would have to modify its own routing table. However, if our external router were receiving only a summary route (i.e., 172.16.0.0/16), then it wouldn't have to be concerned with our work on one particular subnet. This is especially a problem for EIGRP, which can create stuck in active (SIA) routes that can lead to a network melt-down.
Summarization Example We have the following networks that we want to advertise as a single summary route:
* 172.16.100.0/24 * 172.16.101.0/24 * 172.16.102.0/24 * 172.16.103.0/24 * 172.16.104.0/24 * 172.16.105.0/24 * 172.16.106.0/24

This question is in 300-101 Cisco Implementing Cisco IP Routing (ROUTE) Exam
For getting Cisco Certified Network Professional (CCNP) Routing and Switching Certificate




Disclaimers:
The website is not related to, affiliated with, endorsed or authorized by Cisco.
Trademarks, certification & product names are used for reference only and belong to Cisco.
The website does not contain actual questions and answers from Cisco's Certification Exam.

Recommended

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.