An audacious attacker is targeting a web server you oversee. He intends to perform a Slow HTTP POST attack, by manipulating ‘a’ HTTP connection. Each connection sends a byte of data every ‘b’ second, effectively holding up the connections for an extended period. Your server is designed to manage ‘m’ connections per second, but any connections exceeding this number tend to overwhelm the system. Given ‘a=100’ and variable ‘m’, along with the attacker’s intention of maximizing the attack duration ‘D=a*b’, consider the following scenarios. Which is most likely to result in the longest duration of server unavailability?

QuestionsCategory: 312-50v12An audacious attacker is targeting a web server you oversee. He intends to perform a Slow HTTP POST attack, by manipulating ‘a’ HTTP connection. Each connection sends a byte of data every ‘b’ second, effectively holding up the connections for an extended period. Your server is designed to manage ‘m’ connections per second, but any connections exceeding this number tend to overwhelm the system. Given ‘a=100’ and variable ‘m’, along with the attacker’s intention of maximizing the attack duration ‘D=a*b’, consider the following scenarios. Which is most likely to result in the longest duration of server unavailability?
Admin Staff asked 1 year ago
An audacious attacker is targeting a web server you oversee. He intends to perform a Slow HTTP POST attack, by manipulating 'a' HTTP connection. Each connection sends a byte of data every 'b' second, effectively holding up the connections for an extended period. Your server is designed to manage 'm' connections per second, but any connections exceeding this number tend to overwhelm the system. Given 'a=100' and variable 'm', along with the attacker's intention of maximizing the attack duration 'D=a*b', consider the following scenarios. Which is most likely to result in the longest duration of server unavailability?

A. m=90, b=15: The server can manage 90 connections per second, but the attacker's 100 connections exceed this, and with each connection held up for 15 seconds, the attack duration could be significant.

B. m=105, b=12: The server can manage 105 connections per second, more than the attacker's 100 connections, likely maintaining operation despite a moderate hold-up time.

C. m=110, b=20: Despite the attacker sending 100 connections, the server can handle 110 connections per second, therefore likely staying operative, regardless of the hold-up time per connection.

D. m=95, b=10: Here, the server can handle 95 connections per second, but it falls short against the attacker's 100 connections, albeit the hold-up time per connection is lower.










Correct Answer: A

This question is in 312-50v12 exam
For getting CEH Certificate


Next Post

Recommended

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.