During a security event investigation, a junior analyst fails to create an image of a server's hard drive before removing the drive and sending it to the forensics analyst. Later, the evidence from the analysis is not usable in the prosecution of the attackers due to the uncertainty of tampering. Which of the following should the junior analyst have followed?

QuestionsCategory: CAS-003During a security event investigation, a junior analyst fails to create an image of a server's hard drive before removing the drive and sending it to the forensics analyst. Later, the evidence from the analysis is not usable in the prosecution of the attackers due to the uncertainty of tampering. Which of the following should the junior analyst have followed?
Admin Staff asked 6 months ago
During a security event investigation, a junior analyst fails to create an image of a server's hard drive before removing the drive and sending it to the forensics analyst. Later, the evidence from the analysis is not usable in the prosecution of the attackers due to the uncertainty of tampering. Which of the following should the junior analyst have followed?

A. Continuity of operations

B. Chain of custody

C. Order of volatility

D. Data recovery








 

Suggested Answer: C

Community Answer: C

Reference:
https://www.computer-forensics-recruiter.com/order-of-volatility/

This question is in CAS-003 CompTIA Advanced Security Practitioner (CASP+) Exam
For getting CompTIA Advanced Security Practitioner (CASP+) Certificate


Disclaimers:
The website is not related to, affiliated with, endorsed or authorized by CompTIA. 
Trademarks, certification & product names are used for reference only and belong to CompTIA.
The website does not contain actual questions and answers from CompTIA's Certification Exams.

Next Post

Recommended

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.