Questions › Category: 300-410 › Refer to the exhibit.
A network engineer troubleshooting a packet drop problem for the host 172.16.100.5 notices that only one link is used and installed on the routing table, which saturates the bandwidth. Which action must the engineer take to resolve the high bandwidth utilization problem and share the traffic toward this host between the two available links?
A network engineer troubleshooting a packet drop problem for the host 172.16.100.5 notices that only one link is used and installed on the routing table, which saturates the bandwidth. Which action must the engineer take to resolve the high bandwidth utilization problem and share the traffic toward this host between the two available links?Refer to the exhibit.
Please login or Register to submit your answer
The remote branch locations have a static neighbor relationship configured to R1 only. R1 has successful neighbor relationships with the remote locations of R2 and R3, but the end users cannot communicate with each other.
Which configuration resolves the issue?
Refer to the exhibit. Which action restores OSPF adjacency between R1 and R2?
Refer to the exhibit. An engineer wanted to set a tag of 30 to route 10.1.80.65/32 but it failed.
How is the issue fixed?
Refer to the exhibit. The network administrator configured the Chicago router to mutually redistribute the LA and NewYork routes with OSPF routes to be summarized as a single route in EIGRP using the longest summary mask: router eigrp 100 redistribute ospf 1 metric 10 10 10 10 10 router ospf 1 redistribute eigrp 100 subnets
interface E 0/0
ip summary-address eigrp 100 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0
After the configuration, the New York router receives all the specific LA routes but the summary route. Which set of configurations resolves the issue on the
Chicago router?
Refer to the exhibit. Which action resolves the IP SLA for the UDP jitter problem between R4 and R3 Ethernet 0/1 IP addresses?
What are the two effects of this route map configuration? (Choose two.)
