The summary route is not shown in the Router_B routing table after this below configuration on Router_A: interface ethernet 0 description location ID:S4318T3E77F02 ip address 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0 ip summary-address eigrp 1 172.16.80.0 255.255.240.0 Which Router_A configuration resolves the issue by advertising the summary route to Router_B? A. interface loopback 0 ip address 172.18.81.1 255.255.255.0 interface Ethernet 0 ip address 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0 ip summary-address eigrp 1 172.16.80.0 255.255.240.0 B. interface loopback 0 ip address 172.16.79.1 255.255.255.0 interface Ethernet 0 ip address 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0 ip summary-address eigrp 1 172.16.80.0 255.255.240.0 C. interface loopback 0 ip address 172.16.81.1 255.255.255.0 interface Ethernet 0 ip address 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0 ip summary-address eigrp 1 172.16.80.0 255.255.240.0 D. interface loopback 0 ip address 172.16.96.1 255.255.255.0 interface Ethernet 0 ip address 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0 ip summary-address eigrp 1 172.16.80.0 255.255.240.0 Correct Answer: C This question is in 300-410 exam For getting CCNP Enterprise Certificate
Please login or Register to submit your answer
Refer to the exhibit. An engineer notices a connectivity problem between routers R1 and R2. The frequency of this problem is high during peak business hours. Which action resolves the issue?
Refer to the exhibit. R1 is configured with uRPF, and ping to R1 is failing from a source present in the R1 routing table via the GigabitEthernet 0/0 interface. Which action resolves the issue?
Refer to the exhibit. The network administrator configured the Chicago router to mutually redistribute the LA and NewYork routes with OSPF routes to be summarized as a single route in EIGRP using the longest summary mask: router eigrp 100 redistribute ospf 1 metric 10 10 10 10 10 router ospf 1 redistribute eigrp 100 subnets
interface E 0/0
ip summary-address eigrp 100 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0
After the configuration, the New York router receives all the specific LA routes but the summary route. Which set of configurations resolves the issue on the
Chicago router?
Refer to the exhibit. BGP is apping after the CoPP policy is applied.
What are the two solutions to fix the issue? (Choose two.)
Refer to the exhibit. An engineer configures the router 10.1.100.10 for EIGRP autosummarization so that R1 should receive the summary route of 10.0.0.0/8.
However, R1 receives more specific /24 routes.
Which action resolves this issue?
